1986 Mazda RX-7 vs. 2006 Renault Clio
To start off, 2006 Renault Clio is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 2,354 cc, 1986 Mazda RX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Mazda RX-7 (185 HP) has 111 more horse power than 2006 Renault Clio. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Mazda RX-7 should accelerate faster than 2006 Renault Clio.
Because 1986 Mazda RX-7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Mazda RX-7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Mazda RX-7 (246 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 141 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Renault Clio. (105 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1986 Mazda RX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Mazda RX-7 | 2006 Renault Clio | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | RX-7 | Clio |
Year Released | 1986 | 2006 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2354 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 185 HP | 74 HP |
Torque | 246 Nm | 105 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Top Speed | 230 km/hour | 170 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2480 mm |