1986 Mazda RX-7 vs. 2009 Nissan Pathfinder
To start off, 2009 Nissan Pathfinder is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Nissan Pathfinder is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan Pathfinder (187 HP) has 2 more horse power than 1986 Mazda RX-7. (185 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Pathfinder should accelerate faster than 1986 Mazda RX-7.
Because 2009 Nissan Pathfinder is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Mazda RX-7. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Pathfinder will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Nissan Pathfinder has automatic transmission and 1986 Mazda RX-7 has manual transmission. 1986 Mazda RX-7 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Nissan Pathfinder will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Mazda RX-7 | 2009 Nissan Pathfinder | |
Make | Mazda | Nissan |
Model | RX-7 | Pathfinder |
Year Released | 1986 | 2009 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2354 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 185 HP | 187 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4884 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1849 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1834 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2850 mm |