1986 Mercedes-Benz 200 vs. 1982 Zastava 102
To start off, 1986 Mercedes-Benz 200 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Mercedes-Benz 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Mercedes-Benz 200 (118 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Mercedes-Benz 200 should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Mercedes-Benz 200 weights approximately 690 kg more than 1982 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1986 Mercedes-Benz 200 (173 Nm) has 78 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 102. (95 Nm). This means 1986 Mercedes-Benz 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Mercedes-Benz 200 | 1982 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Zastava |
| Model | 200 | 102 |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1982 |
| Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 173 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1460 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2160 mm |
