1986 Mercury Cougar vs. 1981 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 1986 Mercury Cougar is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 670 kg more than 1981 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 1986 Mercury Cougar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Mercury Cougar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Mercury Cougar | 1981 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Mercury | Mitsubishi |
Model | Cougar | Colt |
Year Released | 1986 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 1244 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 3800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1590 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2310 mm |