1986 Mercury Cougar vs. 2002 Proton 400
To start off, 2002 Proton 400 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 484 kg more than 2002 Proton 400.
Because 1986 Mercury Cougar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Mercury Cougar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Proton 400, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Mercury Cougar | 2002 Proton 400 | |
Make | Mercury | Proton |
Model | Cougar | 400 |
Year Released | 1986 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 74 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 996 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2510 mm |