1986 Mercury Cougar vs. 2009 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2009 Volvo XC90 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 3,192 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 118 kg more than 1986 Mercury Cougar.
Because 2009 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Mercury Cougar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Mercury Cougar | 2009 Volvo XC90 | |
| Make | Mercury | Volvo |
| Model | Cougar | XC90 |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 3192 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 235 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1598 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 4810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1900 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2870 mm |
