1986 Mercury Lynx vs. 1998 Volvo S80
To start off, 1998 Volvo S80 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Mercury Lynx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Mercury Lynx would be higher. At 2,461 cc (5 cylinders), 1998 Volvo S80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Volvo S80 (138 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1986 Mercury Lynx. (89 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Volvo S80 should accelerate faster than 1986 Mercury Lynx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Volvo S80 weights approximately 629 kg more than 1986 Mercury Lynx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Volvo S80 (290 Nm @ 1900 RPM) has 146 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Mercury Lynx. (144 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1998 Volvo S80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Mercury Lynx.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Mercury Lynx | 1998 Volvo S80 | |
| Make | Mercury | Volvo |
| Model | Lynx | S80 |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1859 cc | 2461 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 138 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 144 Nm | 290 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 1900 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1025 kg | 1654 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2400 mm | 2670 mm |
