1986 Mercury Lynx vs. 2003 Renault Scenic II
To start off, 2003 Renault Scenic II is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Mercury Lynx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Mercury Lynx would be higher. At 1,859 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Mercury Lynx is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Mercury Lynx (89 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2003 Renault Scenic II. (83 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Mercury Lynx should accelerate faster than 2003 Renault Scenic II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Renault Scenic II weights approximately 255 kg more than 1986 Mercury Lynx.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Renault Scenic II (191 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Mercury Lynx. (144 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2003 Renault Scenic II will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Mercury Lynx.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Mercury Lynx | 2003 Renault Scenic II | |
| Make | Mercury | Renault |
| Model | Lynx | Scenic II |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1859 cc | 1461 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 144 Nm | 191 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1025 kg | 1280 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4270 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2400 mm | 2750 mm |
