1986 Mercury Lynx vs. 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Mercury Lynx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Mercury Lynx would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer (276 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 187 more horse power than 1986 Mercury Lynx. (89 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer should accelerate faster than 1986 Mercury Lynx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer weights approximately 455 kg more than 1986 Mercury Lynx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer (373 Nm) has 229 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Mercury Lynx. (144 Nm). This means 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Mercury Lynx.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Mercury Lynx | 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer | |
Make | Mercury | Mitsubishi |
Model | Lynx | Lancer |
Year Released | 1986 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1859 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 276 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 144 Nm | 373 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1025 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2400 mm | 2560 mm |