1986 Mercury Lynx vs. 2010 Kia Forte
To start off, 2010 Kia Forte is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Mercury Lynx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Mercury Lynx would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Kia Forte is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Kia Forte (156 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1986 Mercury Lynx. (89 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Kia Forte should accelerate faster than 1986 Mercury Lynx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Kia Forte weights approximately 207 kg more than 1986 Mercury Lynx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Kia Forte (195 Nm @ 4300 RPM) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Mercury Lynx. (144 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2010 Kia Forte will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Mercury Lynx.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Mercury Lynx | 2010 Kia Forte | |
Make | Mercury | Kia |
Model | Lynx | Forte |
Year Released | 1986 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1859 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 156 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 144 Nm | 195 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1025 kg | 1232 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4481 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2400 mm | 2649 mm |