1986 Mercury Sable vs. 1960 Seat 600
To start off, 1986 Mercury Sable is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Seat 600 would be higher. At 2,513 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Mercury Sable weights approximately 825 kg more than 1960 Seat 600.
Because 1960 Seat 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Seat 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Mercury Sable, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Mercury Sable | 1960 Seat 600 | |
| Make | Mercury | Seat |
| Model | Sable | 600 |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2513 cc | 598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 19 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 575 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 3300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2010 mm |
