1986 Mercury Sable vs. 1979 Volvo 260
To start off, 1986 Mercury Sable is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Volvo 260. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Volvo 260 would be higher. At 2,664 cc (6 cylinders), 1979 Volvo 260 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Mercury Sable weights approximately 50 kg more than 1979 Volvo 260.
Because 1979 Volvo 260 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Volvo 260. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Mercury Sable, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Mercury Sable | 1979 Volvo 260 | |
Make | Mercury | Volvo |
Model | Sable | 260 |
Year Released | 1986 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2513 cc | 2664 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 146 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1350 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2660 mm |