1986 Mercury Sable vs. 2005 Renault Clio
To start off, 2005 Renault Clio is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Mercury Sable. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Mercury Sable would be higher. At 2,957 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Renault Clio weights approximately 10 kg more than 1986 Mercury Sable.
Because 2005 Renault Clio is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Renault Clio. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Mercury Sable, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Mercury Sable | 2005 Renault Clio | |
Make | Mercury | Renault |
Model | Sable | Clio |
Year Released | 1986 | 2005 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2513 cc | 2957 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 252 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1410 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 3850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2480 mm |