1986 Mercury Sable vs. 2010 Kia Carnival
To start off, 2010 Kia Carnival is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Mercury Sable. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Mercury Sable would be higher. At 2,902 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Kia Carnival is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Kia Carnival weights approximately 820 kg more than 1986 Mercury Sable.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Mercury Sable | 2010 Kia Carnival | |
Make | Mercury | Kia |
Model | Sable | Carnival |
Year Released | 1986 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2513 cc | 2902 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 142 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 2220 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1910 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2910 mm |