1986 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 1992 Renault 19
To start off, 1992 Renault 19 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 1,795 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Renault 19 (78 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1986 Mitsubishi Colt. (57 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Renault 19 should accelerate faster than 1986 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Renault 19 weights approximately 79 kg more than 1986 Mitsubishi Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Mitsubishi Colt (108 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Renault 19. (104 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1986 Mitsubishi Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Renault 19.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Mitsubishi Colt | 1992 Renault 19 | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Renault |
Model | Colt | 19 |
Year Released | 1986 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1795 cc | 1388 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 57 HP | 78 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 108 Nm | 104 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 936 kg | 1015 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2550 mm |