1986 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass

To start off, 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 3,135 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass (158 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 1986 Mitsubishi Colt. (57 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass should accelerate faster than 1986 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 600 kg more than 1986 Mitsubishi Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass (251 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 143 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Mitsubishi Colt. (108 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Mitsubishi Colt.

Compare all specifications:

1986 Mitsubishi Colt 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass
Make Mitsubishi Oldsmobile
Model Colt Cutlass
Year Released 1986 1995
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1795 cc 3135 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 57 HP 158 HP
Engine RPM 4500 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 108 Nm 251 Nm
Torque RPM 2500 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Diesel Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Vehicle Weight 936 kg 1536 kg
Vehicle Length 3880 mm 4930 mm
Vehicle Width 1630 mm 1810 mm
Vehicle Height 1370 mm 1350 mm
Wheelbase Size 2390 mm 2740 mm