1986 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 2010 Mazda 6
To start off, 2010 Mazda 6 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 2,183 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda 6 (127 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1986 Mitsubishi Colt. (57 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1986 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda 6 weights approximately 614 kg more than 1986 Mitsubishi Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda 6 (340 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 232 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Mitsubishi Colt. (108 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2010 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Mitsubishi Colt | 2010 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Mazda |
Model | Colt | 6 |
Year Released | 1986 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1795 cc | 2183 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 57 HP | 127 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Torque | 108 Nm | 340 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 936 kg | 1550 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4755 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1795 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2789 mm |