1986 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 2012 Renault Koleos
To start off, 2012 Renault Koleos is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 2,488 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Renault Koleos is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Renault Koleos (169 HP) has 112 more horse power than 1986 Mitsubishi Colt. (57 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Renault Koleos should accelerate faster than 1986 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Renault Koleos weights approximately 714 kg more than 1986 Mitsubishi Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 Renault Koleos is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Mitsubishi Colt. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Renault Koleos will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Mitsubishi Colt | 2012 Renault Koleos | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Renault |
| Model | Colt | Koleos |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1795 cc | 2488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 57 HP | 169 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 936 kg | 1650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1855 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1695 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2690 mm |
