1986 Mitsubishi Colt vs. 2013 Volvo XC60

To start off, 2013 Volvo XC60 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Volvo XC60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo XC60 (237 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 180 more horse power than 1986 Mitsubishi Colt. (57 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo XC60 should accelerate faster than 1986 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Volvo XC60 weights approximately 855 kg more than 1986 Mitsubishi Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Volvo XC60 (320 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 212 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Mitsubishi Colt. (108 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2013 Volvo XC60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Mitsubishi Colt.

Compare all specifications:

1986 Mitsubishi Colt 2013 Volvo XC60
Make Mitsubishi Volvo
Model Colt XC60
Year Released 1986 2013
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1795 cc 3200 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 57 HP 237 HP
Engine RPM 4500 RPM 6400 RPM
Torque 108 Nm 320 Nm
Torque RPM 2500 RPM 3200 RPM
Fuel Type Diesel Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Vehicle Weight 936 kg 1791 kg
Vehicle Length 3880 mm 4627 mm
Vehicle Width 1630 mm 1891 mm
Vehicle Height 1370 mm 1713 mm
Wheelbase Size 2390 mm 2774 mm