1986 Mitsubishi Debonair vs. 1960 Toyota Master RR
To start off, 1986 Mitsubishi Debonair is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 1,996 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Mitsubishi Debonair is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Mitsubishi Debonair (118 HP) has 78 more horse power than 1960 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Mitsubishi Debonair should accelerate faster than 1960 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Mitsubishi Debonair weights approximately 190 kg more than 1960 Toyota Master RR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 Toyota Master RR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Toyota Master RR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Mitsubishi Debonair, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Mitsubishi Debonair | 1960 Toyota Master RR | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Toyota |
| Model | Debonair | Master RR |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1453 cc |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 40 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1210 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1560 mm |
