1986 Mitsubishi Debonair vs. 1967 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 1986 Mitsubishi Debonair is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,164 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Mitsubishi Debonair (118 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (66 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Mitsubishi Debonair should accelerate faster than 1967 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Mitsubishi Debonair weights approximately 80 kg more than 1967 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1986 Mitsubishi Debonair (171 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (146 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 1986 Mitsubishi Debonair will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Mitsubishi Debonair | 1967 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Nissan |
| Model | Debonair | Cedric |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 2164 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 66 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 171 Nm | 146 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 1800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1320 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1470 mm |
