1986 Mitsubishi Lancer vs. 2009 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2009 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Mitsubishi Lancer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Mitsubishi Lancer would be higher. At 1,781 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Volkswagen Polo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volkswagen Polo (149 HP) has 75 more horse power than 1986 Mitsubishi Lancer. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 1986 Mitsubishi Lancer.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Volkswagen Polo (220 Nm @ 1950 RPM) has 107 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Mitsubishi Lancer. (113 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Volkswagen Polo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Mitsubishi Lancer.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Mitsubishi Lancer | 2009 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Volkswagen |
Model | Lancer | Polo |
Year Released | 1986 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1467 cc | 1781 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 149 HP |
Torque | 113 Nm | 220 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 1950 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4190 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1470 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2470 mm |