1986 Mitsubishi Lancer vs. 2010 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2010 Volvo XC60 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Mitsubishi Lancer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Mitsubishi Lancer would be higher. At 2,000 cc (5 cylinders), 2010 Volvo XC60 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo XC60 weights approximately 861 kg more than 1986 Mitsubishi Lancer.
Because 2010 Volvo XC60 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Mitsubishi Lancer. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volvo XC60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Mitsubishi Lancer | 2010 Volvo XC60 | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Volvo |
Model | Lancer | XC60 |
Year Released | 1986 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1795 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 57 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1060 kg | 1921 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4190 mm | 4628 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1712 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2748 mm |