1986 Mitsubishi Magna vs. 2004 Volvo V40
To start off, 2004 Volvo V40 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Mitsubishi Magna. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Mitsubishi Magna would be higher. At 2,555 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Mitsubishi Magna is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Volvo V40 (169 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1986 Mitsubishi Magna. (111 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Volvo V40 should accelerate faster than 1986 Mitsubishi Magna. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Volvo V40 weights approximately 60 kg more than 1986 Mitsubishi Magna. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Volvo V40 (240 Nm) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Mitsubishi Magna. (195 Nm). This means 2004 Volvo V40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Mitsubishi Magna.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Mitsubishi Magna | 2004 Volvo V40 | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Volvo |
| Model | Magna | V40 |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2555 cc | 1950 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 111 HP | 169 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 195 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1220 kg | 1280 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4630 mm | 4530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2570 mm |
