1986 Mitsubishi Magna vs. 2010 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2010 Holden Commodore is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Mitsubishi Magna. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Mitsubishi Magna would be higher. At 2,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Commodore (240 HP) has 129 more horse power than 1986 Mitsubishi Magna. (111 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1986 Mitsubishi Magna.
Because 2010 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Mitsubishi Magna, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Commodore (240 Nm) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Mitsubishi Magna. (195 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Mitsubishi Magna.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Mitsubishi Magna | 2010 Holden Commodore | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Holden |
| Model | Magna | Commodore |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2555 cc | 2564 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 111 HP | 240 HP |
| Torque | 195 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
