1986 Nissan Cedric vs. 1964 Riley 4
To start off, 1986 Nissan Cedric is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Riley 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Riley 4 would be higher. At 1,973 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Nissan Cedric (102 HP) has 35 more horse power than 1964 Riley 4. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Nissan Cedric should accelerate faster than 1964 Riley 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 123 kg more than 1964 Riley 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Nissan Cedric (167 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Riley 4. (121 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1986 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Riley 4.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Nissan Cedric | 1964 Riley 4 | |
Make | Nissan | Riley |
Model | Cedric | 4 |
Year Released | 1986 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1973 cc | 1622 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 102 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 167 Nm | 121 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1275 kg | 1152 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2530 mm |