1986 Nissan Cedric vs. 2011 Fiat Doblo
To start off, 2011 Fiat Doblo is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,973 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Nissan Cedric (102 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 2011 Fiat Doblo. (69 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Nissan Cedric should accelerate faster than 2011 Fiat Doblo.
Because 1986 Nissan Cedric is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Nissan Cedric. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Fiat Doblo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Fiat Doblo (180 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Nissan Cedric. (167 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2011 Fiat Doblo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Nissan Cedric | 2011 Fiat Doblo | |
| Make | Nissan | Fiat |
| Model | Cedric | Doblo |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1973 cc | 1248 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 102 HP | 69 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 167 Nm | 180 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 1750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2755 mm |
