1986 Nissan Cedric vs. 2012 Holden Calais
To start off, 2012 Holden Calais is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Holden Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Calais (278 HP) has 176 more horse power than 1986 Nissan Cedric. (102 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Calais should accelerate faster than 1986 Nissan Cedric.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Calais (350 Nm) has 183 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Nissan Cedric. (167 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Nissan Cedric. 2012 Holden Calais has automatic transmission and 1986 Nissan Cedric has manual transmission. 1986 Nissan Cedric will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Holden Calais will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Nissan Cedric | 2012 Holden Calais | |
Make | Nissan | Holden |
Model | Cedric | Calais |
Year Released | 1986 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1973 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 102 HP | 278 HP |
Torque | 167 Nm | 350 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |