1986 Nissan Laurel vs. 1992 Ford Tempo
To start off, 1992 Ford Tempo is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Nissan Laurel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Nissan Laurel would be higher. At 3,000 cc, 1986 Nissan Laurel is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1986 Nissan Laurel is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Nissan Laurel. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Ford Tempo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Nissan Laurel | 1992 Ford Tempo | |
Make | Nissan | Ford |
Model | Laurel | Tempo |
Year Released | 1986 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3000 cc | 2986 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 129 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2540 mm |