1986 Nissan Laurel vs. 2001 Rover 25
To start off, 2001 Rover 25 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Nissan Laurel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Nissan Laurel would be higher. At 2,826 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Nissan Laurel is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1986 Nissan Laurel is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Nissan Laurel. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Rover 25, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Nissan Laurel | 2001 Rover 25 | |
| Make | Nissan | Rover |
| Model | Laurel | 25 |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2826 cc | 1119 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 74 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2510 mm |
