1986 Nissan Laurel vs. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Nissan Laurel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Nissan Laurel would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Nissan Laurel | 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Nissan | Jeep |
Model | Laurel | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 1986 | 2003 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2826 cc | 3960 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 195 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2700 mm |