1986 Nissan Laurel vs. 2010 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2010 Volvo XC90 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Nissan Laurel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Nissan Laurel would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2010 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Nissan Laurel. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Nissan Laurel | 2010 Volvo XC90 | |
| Make | Nissan | Volvo |
| Model | Laurel | XC90 |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2826 cc | 3200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 235 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4808 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1897 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1783 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2860 mm |
