1986 Nissan Leopard vs. 1982 Volvo 360
To start off, 1986 Nissan Leopard is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Volvo 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Volvo 360 would be higher. At 1,986 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Volvo 360 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Volvo 360 (101 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1986 Nissan Leopard. (98 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Volvo 360 should accelerate faster than 1986 Nissan Leopard. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Nissan Leopard weights approximately 5 kg more than 1982 Volvo 360.
Let's talk about torque, 1982 Volvo 360 (163 Nm @ 3300 RPM) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Nissan Leopard. (147 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1982 Volvo 360 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Nissan Leopard.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Nissan Leopard | 1982 Volvo 360 | |
| Make | Nissan | Volvo |
| Model | Leopard | 360 |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1770 cc | 1986 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 98 HP | 101 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Torque | 147 Nm | 163 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1105 kg | 1100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4310 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2410 mm |
