1986 Nissan Leopard vs. 2009 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2009 Holden Commodore is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Nissan Leopard. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Nissan Leopard would be higher. At 2,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Commodore (240 HP) has 142 more horse power than 1986 Nissan Leopard. (98 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1986 Nissan Leopard.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Commodore (240 Nm) has 93 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Nissan Leopard. (147 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Nissan Leopard.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Nissan Leopard | 2009 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Nissan | Holden |
Model | Leopard | Commodore |
Year Released | 1986 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1770 cc | 2564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 98 HP | 240 HP |
Torque | 147 Nm | 240 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |