1986 Nissan Leopard vs. 2010 Holden UTE
To start off, 2010 Holden UTE is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Nissan Leopard. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Nissan Leopard would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden UTE (357 HP) has 259 more horse power than 1986 Nissan Leopard. (98 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1986 Nissan Leopard.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden UTE (530 Nm) has 383 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Nissan Leopard. (147 Nm). This means 2010 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Nissan Leopard.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Nissan Leopard | 2010 Holden UTE | |
Make | Nissan | Holden |
Model | Leopard | UTE |
Year Released | 1986 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1770 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 98 HP | 357 HP |
Torque | 147 Nm | 530 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |