1986 Nissan Prairie vs. 2012 Volvo C30
To start off, 2012 Volvo C30 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Nissan Prairie. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Nissan Prairie would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Volvo C30 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Volvo C30 (114 HP) has 35 more horse power than 1986 Nissan Prairie. (79 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Volvo C30 should accelerate faster than 1986 Nissan Prairie. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo C30 weights approximately 476 kg more than 1986 Nissan Prairie. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Volvo C30 (270 Nm) has 149 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Nissan Prairie. (121 Nm). This means 2012 Volvo C30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Nissan Prairie.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Nissan Prairie | 2012 Volvo C30 | |
| Make | Nissan | Volvo |
| Model | Prairie | C30 |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2012 |
| Engine Size | 1485 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 79 HP | 114 HP |
| Torque | 121 Nm | 270 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 975 kg | 1451 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 4252 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1783 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1448 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2639 mm |
