1986 Nissan Pulsar vs. 1975 Volvo 66
To start off, 1986 Nissan Pulsar is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 1,289 cc (4 cylinders), 1975 Volvo 66 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Nissan Pulsar (59 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1975 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Nissan Pulsar should accelerate faster than 1975 Volvo 66.
Because 1975 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Nissan Pulsar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Nissan Pulsar (97 Nm) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Volvo 66. (94 Nm). This means 1986 Nissan Pulsar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Volvo 66.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Nissan Pulsar | 1975 Volvo 66 | |
| Make | Nissan | Volvo |
| Model | Pulsar | 66 |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1975 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1270 cc | 1289 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 56 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 97 Nm | 94 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 3910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1550 mm |
