1986 Nissan Pulsar vs. 1998 Honda CR-V

To start off, 1998 Honda CR-V is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Honda CR-V (128 HP) has 69 more horse power than 1986 Nissan Pulsar. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 1986 Nissan Pulsar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Honda CR-V weights approximately 620 kg more than 1986 Nissan Pulsar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1998 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Nissan Pulsar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Honda CR-V (180 Nm) has 83 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Nissan Pulsar. (97 Nm). This means 1998 Honda CR-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Nissan Pulsar.

Compare all specifications:

1986 Nissan Pulsar 1998 Honda CR-V
Make Nissan Honda
Model Pulsar CR-V
Year Released 1986 1998
Body Type Sedan SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1270 cc 1999 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 59 HP 128 HP
Torque 97 Nm 180 Nm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 880 kg 1500 kg
Vehicle Length 4140 mm 4560 mm
Vehicle Width 1630 mm 1780 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1700 mm
Wheelbase Size 2420 mm 2620 mm