1986 Nissan Pulsar vs. 2000 Chrysler Sebring
To start off, 2000 Chrysler Sebring is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 2,425 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Chrysler Sebring is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chrysler Sebring weights approximately 500 kg more than 1986 Nissan Pulsar.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Chrysler Sebring has automatic transmission and 1986 Nissan Pulsar has manual transmission. 1986 Nissan Pulsar will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Chrysler Sebring will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Nissan Pulsar | 2000 Chrysler Sebring | |
Make | Nissan | Chrysler |
Model | Pulsar | Sebring |
Year Released | 1986 | 2000 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1270 cc | 2425 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 880 kg | 1380 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2640 mm |