1986 Nissan Pulsar vs. 2004 Saturn L
To start off, 2004 Saturn L is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 2,998 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Saturn L is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Saturn L (182 HP) has 123 more horse power than 1986 Nissan Pulsar. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Saturn L should accelerate faster than 1986 Nissan Pulsar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Saturn L weights approximately 604 kg more than 1986 Nissan Pulsar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Saturn L (250 Nm) has 153 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Nissan Pulsar. (97 Nm). This means 2004 Saturn L will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Nissan Pulsar.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Nissan Pulsar | 2004 Saturn L | |
Make | Nissan | Saturn |
Model | Pulsar | L |
Year Released | 1986 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1270 cc | 2998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 182 HP |
Torque | 97 Nm | 250 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 880 kg | 1484 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2710 mm |