1986 Nissan Pulsar vs. 2010 Kia Cee'd

To start off, 2010 Kia Cee'd is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 1,396 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Kia Cee'd is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Kia Cee'd (108 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1986 Nissan Pulsar. (59 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Kia Cee'd should accelerate faster than 1986 Nissan Pulsar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Kia Cee'd weights approximately 519 kg more than 1986 Nissan Pulsar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Kia Cee'd (137 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Nissan Pulsar. (97 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2010 Kia Cee'd will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Nissan Pulsar.

Compare all specifications:

1986 Nissan Pulsar 2010 Kia Cee'd
Make Nissan Kia
Model Pulsar Cee'd
Year Released 1986 2010
Body Type Sedan Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1270 cc 1396 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 59 HP 108 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 6200 RPM
Torque 97 Nm 137 Nm
Torque RPM 3600 RPM 5000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline - Premium
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 880 kg 1399 kg
Vehicle Length 4140 mm 4480 mm
Vehicle Width 1630 mm 1800 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1530 mm
Wheelbase Size 2420 mm 2660 mm