1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 1992 Toyota Lite Ace
To start off, 1992 Toyota Lite Ace is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 226 kg more than 1992 Toyota Lite Ace.
Because 1992 Toyota Lite Ace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Toyota Lite Ace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 1992 Toyota Lite Ace | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Toyota |
Model | Cutlass | Lite Ace |
Year Released | 1986 | 1992 |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 1453 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1326 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1660 mm |