1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 1998 Oldsmobile Aurora
To start off, 1998 Oldsmobile Aurora is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,993 cc (8 cylinders), 1998 Oldsmobile Aurora is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Oldsmobile Aurora weights approximately 394 kg more than 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 1998 Oldsmobile Aurora | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Cutlass | Aurora |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 3993 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 251 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1326 kg | 1720 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 5230 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1900 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2900 mm |
