1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2002 Renault Megane
To start off, 2002 Renault Megane is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,474 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass (89 HP) has 15 more horse power than 2002 Renault Megane. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass should accelerate faster than 2002 Renault Megane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Renault Megane weights approximately 60 kg more than 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass (179 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Renault Megane. (106 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Renault Megane.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 2002 Renault Megane | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Renault |
Model | Cutlass | Megane |
Year Released | 1986 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2474 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 74 HP |
Torque | 179 Nm | 106 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1230 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4220 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2490 mm |