1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2002 Volvo S60
To start off, 2002 Volvo S60 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,299 cc (5 cylinders), 2002 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Volvo S60 weights approximately 434 kg more than 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 2002 Volvo S60 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Volvo S60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 2002 Volvo S60 | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Volvo |
| Model | Cutlass | S60 |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 2299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 208 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1326 kg | 1760 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4580 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2720 mm |
