1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2003 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2003 Ford Ranger is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Ranger weights approximately 394 kg more than 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 2003 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 2003 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Ford |
| Model | Cutlass | Ranger |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1326 kg | 1720 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 5090 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 3010 mm |
