1986 Oldsmobile Incas vs. 2010 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2010 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Oldsmobile Incas. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Oldsmobile Incas would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Oldsmobile Incas is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Oldsmobile Incas (230 HP) has 82 more horse power than 2010 Mitsubishi Colt. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Oldsmobile Incas should accelerate faster than 2010 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 1986 Oldsmobile Incas is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Mitsubishi Colt. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Oldsmobile Incas will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1986 Oldsmobile Incas has automatic transmission and 2010 Mitsubishi Colt has manual transmission. 2010 Mitsubishi Colt will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1986 Oldsmobile Incas will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Oldsmobile Incas | 2010 Mitsubishi Colt | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Incas | Colt |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 1500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 230 HP | 148 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 3640 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1695 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2500 mm |
