1986 Opel Kadett vs. 1963 Reliant Sabre Six
To start off, 1986 Opel Kadett is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Reliant Sabre Six. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Reliant Sabre Six would be higher. At 2,553 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Reliant Sabre Six is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Reliant Sabre Six (108 HP) has 27 more horse power than 1986 Opel Kadett. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Reliant Sabre Six should accelerate faster than 1986 Opel Kadett.
Because 1963 Reliant Sabre Six is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Reliant Sabre Six. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Opel Kadett, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Reliant Sabre Six (185 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Opel Kadett. (132 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 1963 Reliant Sabre Six will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Opel Kadett.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Opel Kadett | 1963 Reliant Sabre Six | |
Make | Opel | Reliant |
Model | Kadett | Sabre Six |
Year Released | 1986 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 2553 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 108 HP |
Torque | 132 Nm | 185 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 82.6 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1280 mm |