1986 Opel Omega vs. 2010 Peugeot 408
To start off, 2010 Peugeot 408 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Opel Omega would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Peugeot 408 (143 HP) has 21 more horse power than 1986 Opel Omega. (122 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Peugeot 408 should accelerate faster than 1986 Opel Omega.
Because 1986 Opel Omega is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Opel Omega. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Peugeot 408, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Peugeot 408 (240 Nm) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Opel Omega. (175 Nm). This means 2010 Peugeot 408 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Opel Omega.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Opel Omega | 2010 Peugeot 408 | |
Make | Opel | Peugeot |
Model | Omega | 408 |
Year Released | 1986 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 122 HP | 143 HP |
Torque | 175 Nm | 240 Nm |
Top Speed | 195 km/hour | 188 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 11.5 seconds | 12.4 seconds |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1815 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1525 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2710 mm |