1986 Peugeot 205 vs. 1968 Skoda 1202
To start off, 1986 Peugeot 205 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Skoda 1202. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Skoda 1202 would be higher. At 1,359 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Peugeot 205 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Peugeot 205 (85 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1968 Skoda 1202. (45 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Peugeot 205 should accelerate faster than 1968 Skoda 1202.
Because 1968 Skoda 1202 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Skoda 1202. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Peugeot 205, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Peugeot 205 (118 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Skoda 1202. (84 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1986 Peugeot 205 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Skoda 1202.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Peugeot 205 | 1968 Skoda 1202 | |
Make | Peugeot | Skoda |
Model | 205 | 1202 |
Year Released | 1986 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1359 cc | 1174 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 45 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 118 Nm | 84 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1590 mm |